Chairman's
COMMENTARY



 

   



First Jobs to Go ?

Article posted on LinkedIN and Facebook, May 1, 2017

 

 

First off.

 

Happy May Day Holiday.  Still a valid labour "festival"... for now, eh ?

 

Highly recommend Peter Diamandis' latest posting on LinkedIN titled "Cashier jobs will vanish. This is how workers should prepare for what's next." as well as his article on his personal website titled "The First Jobs To Go".

 

However much I agree with his comments, I have to take exception to some of his premises.

 

Although most will agree with the basis of Peter's article, some will ask: "But what about cashier/clerks working in a clothing related or some such boutique?"  Customers go there because they want an opinion on what “suits” them best.  They are not interested in a voiceless catalogue.  So let's not generalize, eh. 

 

Certainly for a majority (?), there will be a need to evaluate one’s strengths and weaknesses and attitudes and interests.  Myers-Briggs testing comes to mind.  And these people, unemployed though they may be, will still keep a positive mental attitude and work at finding either another job, and/or retraining to get new skill sets, and/or strike out on their own as entrepreneurs, especially once they discouver one fo the secrets of true happiness... working at something that you love.

 

For such like-minded people, take a look at Sylvia Perez's "old" article titled "8 Lessons Learned After Losing Job".  It will give you some practical guidance on handling such a situation.

 

For many though, it will be enough to get a UBI (universal basic income, a.k.a. no work, salary anyways). 

 

Hopefully most will analyse their life and get a meaning to their lives.  Regrettably, many will wonder if it will be (its) only so much wasted effort because of the current (and future?) economic-political-business climate (financial crisis and bail-outs, etc.) that makes them wonder if we are not already in a 1984-style environment. 

 

I for one am not sitting on the sidelines. 

 

And that brings me to question why Peter's "Abundance 360" program caters only to CEOs of $10M-$10B companies.  What, are they the only ones with “smarts”?  The only ones capable of leading us common people who have no “value”?  Because they make a lot of money?  Gimme a break.  Life is not only about money.  Remember that the majority of innovations, and subsequent jobs, come from extraordinary common people at startups and/or SMEs.

 

AIs are here to stay, and will only get smarter and more pervasive in our current capitalist environments since it is mainly a way for corporate monoliths to ensure even more profits, irrespective of the impacts on our Global Village spaceship earth.

 

Growth AND maturity of our civilization is what is important... and paramount to ensure our survival... all of us, not just a few.